Psychodermatology: A Multidisciplinary Scientometric Study of Collaborated Literature of Dermatology and Psychiatry

Research on psychodermatology

  • Engin Senel Department of Dermatology, Hitit University, Faculty of Medicine, Corum, Turkey http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8098-1686
  • Ece Yazla Department of Psychiatry, Hitit University, Faculty of Medicine, Corum, Turkey
Keywords: Psychodermatology, psychiatry, dermatology, scientometric, bibliometric

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to provide insight into the evolution of research on psychodermatology using bibliometric network analysis.

Materials and Methods: We analyzed all documents in psychodermatology literature indexed between 1981 and 2020 by using a search string including the following keywords: “psychodermatology”, "psychiatry and dermatology", “dermatopsychiatry” or "dermatopsychology" in the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection database.

Results: Our literature search on WoS databases revealed a total of 498 documents, 99 of which were open access. When evaluated in terms of sheer volume, most of the studies in this field were authored by researchers based in the United States of America, with 118 documents (23.7%). The most productive source title in this field was the British Journal of Dermatology. Among authors, Bewley A. from Bart's Health NHS Trust (United Kingdom) was the most prolific author with 68 articles. The most cited article of psychodermatology literature was a review titled “Psychodermatology: An update” by Gupta and Gupta.

Conclusıons: It is possible to say that the interest in the field of psychodermatology appears to be low, especially since a single researcher has authored over 10% of the WoS articles in this field.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Mostaghimi L. Psychocutaneous Medicine Clinic: Wisconsin Experience. J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry. 2021;62(5):522-7.
2. Şenel E. Evolution of military medicine literature: a scientometric study of global publications on military medicine between 1978 and 2017. BMJ Mil Health. 2020;166(E):e25-e33.
3. Kendall S. PubMed, Web of Science, or Google Scholar? A behind-the-scenes guide for life scientists. : Which one is best: PubMed, Web of Science, or Google Scholar? : LibGuides; 2019 [15 March 2020]. Available from: https://libguides.lib.msu.edu/c.php?g=96972&p=627295.
4. Paintmaps. COLOR MAPs with STATISTICAL DATA [Internet]. [05 December 2021]. Available from: https://paintmaps.com/.
5. Vosviewer. Visualizing scientific landscapes [Internet]. [10 January 2020]. Available from: https://www.vosviewer.com/.
6. Tohid H, Shenefelt PD, Burney WA, Aqeel N. Psychodermatology: An Association of Primary Psychiatric Disorders With Skin. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr (Engl Ed). 2019;48(1):50-7.
7. Slattery MJ, Essex MJ, Paletz EM, Vanness ER, Infante M, Rogers GM, et al. Depression, anxiety, and dermatologic quality of life in adolescents with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;128(3):668-71.
8. Kępska A, Majtyka M, Kowman M, Kłoszewska I, Kwiecińska E, Zalewska-Janowska A. Dermatitis artefacta as a symptom of schizophrenia? Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2014;31(4):277-9.
9. Dominguez PL, Han J, Li T, Ascherio A, Qureshi AA. Depression and the risk of psoriasis in US women. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013;27(9):1163-7.
10. Salinas-Ríos K. Bibliometrics, a useful tool within the field of research. J Appl Psychol. 2022;3(6):9-16.
11. Leydesdorff L, Milojevic S. Scientometrics. arXiv preprint arXiv: 12084566. 2012.
12. Nundy S, Kakar A, Bhutta ZA. How to Practice Academic Medicine and Publish from Developing Countries?: A Practical Guide: Springer Nature; 2022.
13. Tarazona B, Vidal-Infer A, Alonso-Arroyo A. Bibliometric analysis of the scientific production in implantology (2009-2013). Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(7):864-70.
14. Yeung AWK, Leung WK. Citation Network Analysis of Dental Implant Literature from 2007 to 2016. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(6):1240-6.
15. Ahmad P, Dummer PMH, Chaudhry A, Rashid U, Saif S, Asif JA. A bibliometric study of the top 100 most-cited randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in endodontic journals. Int Endod J. 2019;52(9):1297-316.
16. Ordinola-Zapata R, Peters OA, Nagendrababu V, Azevedo B, Dummer PMH, Neelakantan P. What is of interest in Endodontology? A bibliometric review of research published in the International Endodontic Journal and the Journal of Endodontics from 1980 to 2019. Int Endod J. 2020;53(1):36-52.
17. Li Z, Zhu L. The scientometric analysis of the research on microalgae-based wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021;28(20):25339-48.
18. Zhou W, Wang X. Human gene therapy: A scientometric analysis. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;138:111510.
19. Shapori B. Should You Be Seeing a Psychodermatologist? : allure; 2021 [25 September 2021]. Available from: https://www.allure.com/story/what-is-psychodermatology.
20. Jafferany M, Franca K. Psychodermatology: Basics Concepts. Acta Derm Venereol. 2016;96(217):35-7.
21. Kodonas K, Fardi A, Gogos C, Economides N. Scientometric analysis of vital pulp therapy studies. Int Endod J. 2021;54(2):220-30.
22. Gupta MA, Gupta AK. Psychodermatology: an update. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;34(6):1030-46.
Published
2023-07-04
How to Cite
1.
Senel E, Yazla E. Psychodermatology: A Multidisciplinary Scientometric Study of Collaborated Literature of Dermatology and Psychiatry. jms [Internet]. 2023Jul.4 [cited 2026Oct.24];26(2):28-7. Available from: http://dsh.jmsskims.org/index.php/jms/article/view/1267
Section
Original Articles